<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:np="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/ns/nonTEI" xml:id="MINT01899" type="transcription">
    <teiHeader>
        <fileDesc>
            <titleStmt>
                <title>Holograph draft of <ref target="/catalogue/record/MINT00173">MINT00173</ref> (Mint 19/1/109)</title>
                <author xml:id="in"><persName key="nameid_1" sort="Newton, Isaac" ref="nameid_1" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/catalogue/xml/persNames.xml">Isaac Newton</persName></author>
                
            </titleStmt>
<extent><hi rend="italic">c.</hi> <num n="word_count" value="2315">2,315</num> words</extent>
            <publicationStmt>
                <authority>The Newton Project</authority>
                <pubPlace>Oxford</pubPlace>
                <date>2017</date>
                <publisher>Newton Project, University of Oxford</publisher>
                <availability n="lic-text" status="restricted"><licence target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/"><p>This text is licensed under a <ref target="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License</ref>.</p></licence></availability>
            </publicationStmt>
            <notesStmt>
<note type="metadataLine">After 21 August 1710, <hi rend="italic">c.</hi> 2,315 words.</note>
                <note n="related_texts">
                    <linkGrp n="document_relations" xml:base="http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk/view/normalized/"><ptr type="is_version_of" target="MINT00173">Memorandum by Newton: 'Of the assaying of Gold and Silver, the making of indented Triall-pieces and trying the moneys in the Pix' [MINT 19/1/109]</ptr></linkGrp>
                </note>
            </notesStmt>
            <sourceDesc><bibl type="simple" n="custodian_27" sortKey="mint_19/01/295-8" subtype="Manuscript">MINT 19/1/295-8, National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey, UK</bibl>
                <msDesc>
                    <msIdentifier>
                        <country>UK</country><region>Surrey</region><settlement>Kew, Richmond</settlement><repository n="custodian_27">National Archives</repository>
                        <idno n="MINT 19/01/295-8">MINT 19/1/295-8</idno>
                    </msIdentifier>
                </msDesc></sourceDesc>
        </fileDesc>
        <profileDesc>
            <creation>
                <origDate when="1710-08-21">After 21 August 1710</origDate>
                <origPlace>England</origPlace>
            </creation>
            <langUsage>
                <language ident="eng">English</language>
            </langUsage>
            <handNotes>
                <handNote sameAs="#in">Holograph</handNote>
            </handNotes>
        </profileDesc>
        <encodingDesc>
            <classDecl><taxonomy><category><catDesc n="Mint">Mint</catDesc><category><catDesc n="PyxTrialsAndAnalysesOfBritishCoinage">Pyx Trials and Analyses of British Coinage</catDesc></category></category></taxonomy></classDecl>
        </encodingDesc>
        <revisionDesc>
            <change when="2001-01-01" type="metadata">Catalogue information compiled by Rob Iliffe, Peter Spargo &amp; John Young</change>
            <change when="2011-09-29" type="metadata">Catalogue exported to teiHeader by <name xml:id="mjh">Michael Hawkins</name></change>
            <change when="2017-01-23">Transcribed by <name>Will Scott</name></change>
        </revisionDesc>
    </teiHeader>
    <text>
        <body>
            <div xml:lang="eng">
                
                <pb xml:id="p295r" n="295r"/><fw type="pag" place="bottomLeft">295</fw><fw type="pag" place="bottomRight">161</fw>
                
                <p rend="center" xml:id="par1">The present state of the Coynage in relation to the <lb xml:id="l1"/>fineness of the moneys. <space dim="vertical" unit="lines" extent="3"/></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par2"><hi rend="large">A</hi>ssaying &amp; refining are operations of the same kind. The Assayer <lb xml:id="l2"/>refines a small piece of any mass of gold or silver &amp; by the decrease <lb xml:id="l3"/>of its weight makes his report, &amp; if there be no decrease, that is, if the <lb xml:id="l4"/>mass  be of the same fineness with the <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">refined</add> Assay piece, he reports it <del type="cancelled">better</del> <lb xml:id="l5"/>two carats better than standard, or twenty &amp; f<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">o</add>ur carats fine; &amp; this <lb xml:id="l6"/>is fine gold in the sense of the Law. The Assay-piece therefore when the <lb xml:id="l7"/>Assay<del type="over">T</del><add place="over" indicator="no">e</add>r works exactly becomes fine gold or fine silver in the sense <lb xml:id="l8"/>of the l<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">a</add>w. And because the Assayer works more exactly to a rule <lb xml:id="l9"/>then the Refiner, &amp; makes better dispatch, the Assay is made the <lb xml:id="l10"/>standing universal Rule of  valuing gold &amp; silver in all nations in point <lb xml:id="l11"/>of fineness, &amp; the Law in ordeining that standard Gold shall be <lb xml:id="l12"/>22 Carats fine &amp; standard silver 11 ounces two  penny weight fine, means <lb xml:id="l13"/>by the Assay.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par3">The standard Triall pieces are made by the Assay. First the <lb xml:id="l14"/>Iury procures gold &amp;  silver <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">r</add>efined  by the Refiner, &amp; then assays the <lb xml:id="l15"/>same <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">several times</add> to see if <add place="inline" indicator="no">t</add><del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="2"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">he</add><add place="inline" indicator="no">y</add> be of a just degree of fineness; that  is, the gold just <lb xml:id="l16"/>two carats better then <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">s</add>tandard &amp; the silver just 18 penny weight better. <lb xml:id="l17"/>And then the Trial-pieces are made the Iury assays them several <lb xml:id="l18"/>times to see if they be standard. <add place="inline interlinear" indicator="no">They must agree therefore <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> the Assay as exactly <lb xml:id="l19"/>as is possible least there be two standards.</add></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par4">The <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">a</add>ssays of gold ought to be made with two waters &amp; no <lb xml:id="l20"/>more, this being the constant practise of Assaying, &amp; the water ought <lb xml:id="l21"/>to be of the usual strength, &amp; to work the usual time, &amp; in the usual <lb xml:id="l22"/>heat, &amp; the Assay piece ought to be <del type="strikethrough">of the usuall strength</del> hammered to <lb xml:id="l23"/>the usual <del type="strikethrough">thickness</del><add place="supralinear" indicator="no">thinness</add> that the assays may be uniform.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par5">Refiners find it difficult to refine gold to the degree of 24 carats. <lb xml:id="l24"/>They seldome make it above 23 Carats <choice><sic>th<del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">r</add>e</sic><corr>three</corr></choice> three quarters <lb xml:id="l25"/>of a grain fine<del type="cancelled"><unclear reason="del" cert="low">r</unclear></del>, &amp; by fine gold generally understand  gold of this degree <lb xml:id="l26"/>of fineness. And thence it comes  to pass that the goldsmiths are <lb xml:id="l27"/>generally of opinion that gold cannot be made above 24 carats <lb xml:id="l28"/>fine. But if when they have watered their granulated gold once or <lb xml:id="l29"/>twice <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> Aqua fortis, they should dulcify it &amp; grind it very fine <del type="strikethrough"><unclear reason="del" cert="low">with</unclear></del> <lb xml:id="l30"/>as painters do thir colours, &amp; then <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">dry it &amp;</add> water it once or twice more with <lb xml:id="l31"/>double Aqua fortis in the same degree of heat as <del type="strikethrough"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del> before, &amp; keep it <lb xml:id="l32"/>longer in the water then before, stirring <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">it</add> now &amp; then with a wooden stick <lb xml:id="l33"/>to make the gold <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">m</add>ix <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> fresh water, the gold will become finer then four &amp; twenty carats. Chymists <lb xml:id="l34"/>also tell us that Gold may be made finer by Antimony then by Aqua fortis and consequence then by the Assay.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par6">If Refiners should work perfectly in the same manner with Assayers, <lb xml:id="l35"/>that is, if they should mix gold with silver in the same proportion, &amp; drive it <lb xml:id="l36"/>off the Test <choice><abbr>w<hi rend="superscript">th</hi></abbr><expan>with</expan></choice> <choice><abbr>y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi></abbr><expan>the</expan></choice> same proportion of lead &amp; hammer <add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">it</add> to <choice><abbr>y<hi rend="superscript">e</hi></abbr><expan>the</expan></choice> very same <lb xml:id="l37"/>thinness &amp; water it with waters of the same strength in the same degree <lb xml:id="l38"/>of heat during the same length of time; their gold would become just <lb xml:id="l39"/>24 carats fine. But they work not with so much curiosity &amp; <del type="cancelled"><unclear reason="del" cert="low">stand</unclear></del> <lb xml:id="l40"/>eavenness. <add place="inline" indicator="no"><del type="strikethrough">And</del> In the fineness of gold made fine by the Refiners art there is much more <lb xml:id="l41"/>uncertainty then in that of gold made fine by the Asaay.</add></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par7">The trial of the moneys in the Pix is to be performed after 
                    
                    <fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">the</fw><pb xml:id="p295v" n="295v"/><fw type="pag" place="bottomRight">296</fw>
                    
                    the most just manner that can be made by fire by water by touch <del type="cancelled">by</del> <lb xml:id="l42"/>or by weight or by all or by any of them. If the Triall pieces be <del type="strikethrough">made</del> <lb xml:id="l43"/>made exactly, the trial thereby is the most expedite &amp; the least liable <lb xml:id="l44"/>to errors. But a Trial piece may happen to be erroneous &amp; then <lb xml:id="l45"/>other ways of assaying may be also usefull. For the Assay by <lb xml:id="l46"/>the assay-weights exactly made will  discover the error of the tryall <lb xml:id="l47"/>piece if there be any, &amp; how great that error  is<del type="over">.</del><add place="over" indicator="no">,</add> <add place="inline" indicator="no">&amp; the Assay by <lb xml:id="l48"/>the touch is also lawfull tho it be less exact &amp; not to be depended <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">u</add>pon alone.</add></p>
                
                <p xml:id="par8">At the last trial of the Pix the Iury by the Assay found <lb xml:id="l49"/>that the money was standard full &amp; the Trial piece a quarter <lb xml:id="l50"/>of a grain better then the money, &amp; reported in their Veredict <lb xml:id="l51"/>that the money was a quarter of a grain <del type="cancelled">be</del> worse then standard <lb xml:id="l52"/>by the Trial piece. The Report implied that the Trial piece was <lb xml:id="l53"/>standard &amp; the money &amp; quarter of a grain wors then standard, <lb xml:id="l54"/>tho the Iury found <del type="over"><gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></del><add place="over" indicator="no">b</add>y the triall that the money was standard &amp; the <lb xml:id="l55"/>trial piece a quarter of a grain better then standard.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par9">When I came first to the Mint &amp; for some years before, the <lb xml:id="l56"/>Importers were allowed the advantage of almost all the Remedy &amp; then <lb xml:id="l57"/>the gold imported made about four pounds &amp; two pence per ounce <lb xml:id="l58"/>standard. The Goldsmiths now complain that their gold doth not make <lb xml:id="l59"/>four pounds per ounce. It should make only three pounds nineteen <choice><abbr>sh.</abbr><expan>shillings</expan></choice> <lb xml:id="l60"/>&amp; eight pence three farthings, &amp; so much it hath made ever since <lb xml:id="l61"/>the last trial of the Pix.</p>
                
                <p xml:id="par10">While the Importers were allowed the advantage of almost <lb xml:id="l62"/>all the remedy, there wanted about thirty grains of fine <lb xml:id="l63"/>gold in four &amp; forty guineas &amp; an half, &amp; as much or <lb xml:id="l64"/>more fine silver in sixty &amp; two shillings. There is now <lb xml:id="l65"/>the just quantity of gold &amp; silver in the moneys, &amp; there <lb xml:id="l66"/>wants only about 15 grains of copper in 44<formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mfrac><mn>1</mn><mn>2</mn></mfrac></math></formula> Guineas, or <tei:lb xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="l67"/>the thirds part of a grain of copper in a Guinea, <tei:choice xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><tei:abbr>w<tei:hi rend="superscript">ch</tei:hi></tei:abbr><tei:expan>which</tei:expan></tei:choice> want <tei:lb xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="l68"/>is of no value or consequence being less then the thousandth <tei:lb xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="l69"/>part of a penny, &amp; is occasioned by the want of so much allay in <tei:lb xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="l70"/>the trial pieces.</p>
                
                <tei:pb xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="p297r" n="297r"/><tei:fw xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" type="pag" place="bottomLeft">297</tei:fw>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" rend="center" xml:id="par11"><tei:hi rend="large">The present state of the <tei:del type="over">m</tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">C</tei:add>oynage <tei:lb xml:id="l71"/>in relation to the fineness <tei:lb xml:id="l72"/>of the moneys.</tei:hi> <tei:space dim="vertical" unit="lines" extent="3"/></tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par12">Assaying &amp; refining are operations of the same kind. <tei:lb xml:id="l73"/>The Assayer  refines a small piece of any mass of gold or <tei:lb xml:id="l74"/>silver &amp; by the decrease  of its weight makes his report: &amp; if <tei:lb xml:id="l75"/>there be no decrease, that is, if the mass  be of the same fineness <tei:lb xml:id="l76"/>with the refined Assay piece, he reports it two carrats better <tei:lb xml:id="l77"/>then standard, or twenty &amp; four carats fine: &amp; this is fine <tei:lb xml:id="l78"/>gold in the sense of the Law. The Assay-piece therefore when <tei:lb xml:id="l79"/>the Assayer works exactly, becomes fine gold <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">o</tei:add>r fine silver in <tei:lb xml:id="l80"/>the sense of the Law. And all <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">g</tei:add>old &amp; silver <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">o</tei:add>f the same <tei:lb xml:id="l81"/>degree of fineness is fine gold &amp; fine silver among merchants <tei:lb xml:id="l82"/>in the sense of the Law. And because the Assayer works <tei:lb xml:id="l83"/>more exactly to a rule then the Refiner, &amp; makes better <tei:lb xml:id="l84"/>dispatch, the Assay is made the standing universal Rule of <tei:lb xml:id="l85"/>valuing gold &amp; silver in all nations in <tei:del type="strikethrough">valuing</tei:del> point of fineness, <tei:lb xml:id="l86"/>&amp; the Law in ordei<tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">n</tei:add>ing that standard Gold shall be 22 carats <tei:lb xml:id="l87"/>fine &amp; standard silver 11 ounces 2 penny weight fine, <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">m</tei:add>eans <tei:lb xml:id="l88"/>by the Assay.</tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par13">The assays of gold ought to be made <tei:choice><tei:abbr>w<tei:hi rend="superscript">th</tei:hi></tei:abbr><tei:expan>with</tei:expan></tei:choice> two waters &amp; <tei:add place="lineEnd" indicator="no">no</tei:add> <tei:lb xml:id="l89"/><tei:del type="strikethrough">the <tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del> more, this being  the constant practise of assaying; &amp; the waters <tei:lb xml:id="l90"/>ought to be of the usual strength, (the second water stronger then the first,) <tei:lb xml:id="l91"/>&amp; to work the usual time &amp; in the  usual heat, &amp; the Assay piece <tei:lb xml:id="l92"/>ought to be hammered to <tei:choice><tei:abbr>y<tei:hi rend="superscript">e</tei:hi></tei:abbr><tei:expan>the</tei:expan></tei:choice> usual thinness  that the Assays may <tei:lb xml:id="l93"/>be uniform. And the assays of silver ought to be made  with a <tei:lb xml:id="l94"/>due proportion of lead in a due &amp; eaven heat, &amp; as soon as the <tei:lb xml:id="l95"/>lead is blown off &amp; the silver looks bright &amp; glittering, the silver <tei:lb xml:id="l96"/>must begin to cool  without roasting it, &amp; it must cool slowly that <tei:lb xml:id="l97"/>it do not spring. But in refining  gold &amp; silver in great quantities <tei:lb xml:id="l98"/>these niceties are not observed</tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par14">Refiners find it difficult to refine gold to the degree of 24 <tei:lb xml:id="l99"/>carats. They  seldome make it above 23 carats 3 grains &amp; 3 quarters <tei:lb xml:id="l100"/>of a grain fine, &amp; by fine gold ge<tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">ne</tei:add>rally understand  gold of this <tei:lb xml:id="l101"/>degree of fineness. And if gold at any time prove finer<tei:del type="cancelled">,</tei:del> upon the <tei:lb xml:id="l102"/>Assay, Assayermasters out of prejudice do not report it finer. And <tei:lb xml:id="l103"/>thence it <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">c</tei:add>omes  to pass that the Goldsmiths are generally of <tei:lb xml:id="l104"/>opinion that gold cannot be above 24  carats fine. But <tei:lb xml:id="l105"/>if when they have watered their granulated gold once or twice <tei:lb xml:id="l106"/>with Aqua fortis, they should dulcify it &amp; grind it very <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="4"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">fine</tei:add> <tei:lb xml:id="l107"/>as painters do their colours, &amp; then water it once or twice more <tei:lb xml:id="l108"/>with double Aqua fortis in the same degree of heat as before <tei:lb xml:id="l109"/>&amp; keep it longer in the water then before stirring it now &amp; <tei:lb xml:id="l110"/>then with a wooden stick to make the gold mix with fresh water <tei:lb xml:id="l111"/>the Gold will become finer then by the Assay, &amp; by consequence 
                    
                    <tei:fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">finer</tei:fw><tei:pb xml:id="p297v" n="297v"/>
                    
                    finer then four &amp; twenty carats. Chymists also tell us that Gold <tei:lb xml:id="l112"/>may be made finer by Antimony then by Aqua fortis, &amp; by conse<tei:lb type="hyphenated" xml:id="l113"/>quence then by the Assay; &amp; Gold refined by Antimony is of a <tei:lb xml:id="l114"/>better colour then Gold refined by Aqua fortis, &amp; by reason of <tei:lb xml:id="l115"/>its fineness will god much further in gilding <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes"><tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">a</tei:add>s I have heard<tei:choice><tei:sic>.</tei:sic><tei:corr type="noText"/></tei:choice></tei:add>. But the <tei:del type="strikethrough">Goldsmiths</tei:del><tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="no">Refiners</tei:add> of <tei:lb xml:id="l116"/>this city know not how to refine gold by Antimony. <tei:add place="inline interlinear" indicator="no"> <tei:del type="cancelled"><tei:lb type="intentional" xml:id="l117"/><tei:space dim="horizontal" unit="chars" extent="5"/> The Assays of silver ought to be made <tei:choice><tei:abbr>w<tei:hi rend="superscript">th</tei:hi></tei:abbr><tei:expan>with</tei:expan></tei:choice> a due proportion <tei:lb xml:id="l118"/>of lead in a due &amp; eaven heat, &amp; as soon as the Lead is blown off</tei:del> <tei:lb xml:id="l119"/>silver by more lead &amp; <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">being</tei:add> <tei:choice><tei:sic>rost<tei:del type="over">in</tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">ed</tei:add><tei:del type="cancelled">g</tei:del></tei:sic><tei:corr>roasted</tei:corr></tei:choice>, becomes finer then by the common way <tei:lb xml:id="l120"/>of assaying, but not a halfpenny weight finer.</tei:add></tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par15">If Refiners should work perfectly in th<tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">e</tei:add> same <tei:lb xml:id="l121"/>manner with Assayers, that is, if they should mix gold <tei:lb xml:id="l122"/>with silver <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">i</tei:add>n the same proportion &amp; drive it off the Test <tei:lb xml:id="l123"/>with the same proportion of lead &amp; hammer it to the very <tei:lb xml:id="l124"/>same <tei:del type="cancelled">degree</tei:del> thinness &amp; water it with waters of the s<tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="2"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">am</tei:add>e <tei:lb xml:id="l125"/>strength in the same degree of heat during the same length <tei:lb xml:id="l126"/>of time; their gold would become just 24 carats fine. <tei:del type="over">But</tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">And</tei:add> <tei:lb xml:id="l127"/>by imitating the Assayer their silver would become 12 ounces <tei:lb xml:id="l128"/>fine. But they work not with so much curiosity &amp; eavenness. <tei:lb xml:id="l129"/>Their <tei:del type="cancelled">silver</tei:del> fine gold &amp; fine silver must be assayed to know <tei:lb xml:id="l130"/>the just degree of fineness.</tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par16">The standard Triall Pieces are made by the Assay. First <tei:lb xml:id="l131"/>the Iury procures gold &amp; silver refined  by the Refiner, &amp; then <tei:lb xml:id="l132"/>assays the same several times to see if they be <tei:del type="cancelled">standard</tei:del> of a <tei:lb xml:id="l133"/>just degree of fineness, that  is the gold just two carats better <tei:lb xml:id="l134"/>then standard &amp; the silver just 18 penny weight better. And <tei:lb xml:id="l135"/>when the trial pieces are made the Iury assays them several <tei:lb xml:id="l136"/>time to see if they be standard. They must agree therefore <tei:lb xml:id="l137"/>with the assay as exactly as is possible least there be two <tei:lb xml:id="l138"/>standards, one by the assay-weights the other by the Triall-<tei:lb xml:id="l139"/>piece. And assay taken from them in several places must <tei:lb xml:id="l140"/>agree with one another to see if the fine gold &amp; fine silver be <tei:lb xml:id="l141"/>eavenly mixed with the allay.</tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par17">The triall of the moneys in the Pix is to be <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">p</tei:add>erformed <tei:lb xml:id="l142"/>after the most just manner that can be made by fire by <tei:lb xml:id="l143"/>water by touch  or by weight or by all or by any of them <tei:lb xml:id="l144"/>If the triall piece be exactly made, the triall thereby is the <tei:lb xml:id="l145"/>most expedite &amp; the least liable to errors. But a Triall piece <tei:lb xml:id="l146"/>may happen to be erroneus, &amp; then <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">the</tei:add> other ways <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">o</tei:add>f assaying, as they <tei:lb xml:id="l147"/>are lawfull, <tei:del type="over"><tei:unclear reason="del" cert="low">t</tei:unclear></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">s</tei:add>o they may be also usefull. For the assay by the <tei:lb xml:id="l148"/>assay-weights exactly made will discover the error of the Trial pieces <tei:lb xml:id="l149"/>if there be any &amp; how great that error is; &amp; the Assay by the <tei:lb xml:id="l150"/>touch being very easy may be <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">also</tei:add> used to see how it agrees with the other <tei:lb xml:id="l151"/>assays, but is less exact &amp; not to be depended upon alone</tei:p>
                
                <tei:p xmlns:tei="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xml:id="par18">At the last Trial of the Pix the Iury by the Assay <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">f</tei:add>ound <tei:lb xml:id="l152"/>that the money was standard full &amp; the Triall piece &amp; quarter <tei:lb xml:id="l153"/>of a grain better then the money, &amp; reported in their Veredict <tei:lb xml:id="l154"/>that the money was a quarter of a grain worse then standard <tei:lb xml:id="l155"/>by the Trial piece. The <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">V</tei:add>eredict implied that the Trial piece <tei:lb xml:id="l156"/>was standard &amp; the money a quarter of a grain wors then standard <tei:lb xml:id="l157"/>tho the Iury <tei:del type="strikethrough"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="words" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="infralinear" indicator="no"><tei:del type="strikethrough"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="words" extent="1"/></tei:del></tei:add><tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="no">found</tei:add> by the Triall that the money was standard &amp; the
                    
                    <tei:fw type="catch" place="bottomRight">Trial</tei:fw><tei:pb xml:id="p298r" n="298r"/>
                    
                    Trial piece a quarter of a grain better then standard. By my <tei:lb xml:id="l158"/>assays th<tei:del type="over">e</tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">i</tei:add><tei:add place="inline" indicator="no">s</tei:add> Triall piece is five twelfts of a grain  better then <tei:lb xml:id="l159"/>standard, that of 1688 is a <tei:del type="strikethrough">quarter</tei:del><tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="no">sixt part</tei:add> of a grain better, that of <tei:lb xml:id="l160"/>1660 is standard. 
                    
                     <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">Quære</tei:add> If upon any Trial of the Pix the Trial piece <tei:lb xml:id="l161"/>prove better or worse then standard, are not the Iury to ascertain <tei:lb xml:id="l162"/>&amp; report the error<tei:del type="over">,</tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">?</tei:add> &amp; may not the Master of the Mint by an <tei:lb xml:id="l163"/>Order of Council allow for that error in coining the money by <tei:lb xml:id="l164"/>that Trial priece for the future<tei:add place="inline" indicator="no">,</tei:add><tei:del type="cancelled">?</tei:del> without putting the Government <tei:lb xml:id="l165"/>to the trouble &amp; <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="2"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">ch</tei:add>arge of making a new <tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="3"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">one</tei:add>? Or must <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">a new trial piece be made or</tei:add> the money <tei:lb xml:id="l166"/>continue to be coyned &amp; tryed by a fals trial piece <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">without <tei:del type="strikethrough">allowing for</tei:del><tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="no">in <tei:gap reason="hand" unit="chars" extent="6"/>ing in</tei:add> the error</tei:add> &amp; <tei:add place="infralinear" indicator="no">so</tei:add> the Company <tei:lb xml:id="l167"/>of Goldsmiths have it in their power <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">without controll</tei:add> to <tei:del type="cancelled">vary th</tei:del> alter the standard <tei:lb xml:id="l168"/>&amp; make <tei:del type="strikethrough">it what they please</tei:del><tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="no"><tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">a</tei:add> new standard</tei:add> as often as they are to make a new <tei:add place="supralinear" indicator="yes">standard</tei:add> tryal <tei:lb xml:id="l169"/>piece<tei:del type="over"><tei:gap reason="illgblDel" unit="chars" extent="1"/></tei:del><tei:add place="over" indicator="no">?</tei:add></tei:p>
                
                
            </div>
        </body>
    </text>
</TEI>